This page is updated every two months with current best practices for Google Ads Auction Insights and competitor analysis. The auction is relative, so what your competitors do changes your costs and visibility; reading Auction Insights well tells you where to push, where to defend and where to concede. Each update draws on our own experience plus authoritative industry sources and verified real-time research. Bookmark this page and check back for the latest competitive analysis best practices. Each update includes worked examples with the arithmetic shown.
Last updated: 8 August 2026
In This Guide
- Executive Summary
- Benchmarks & Numbers at a Glance
- What Auction Insights Tells You
- Impression Share & Lost IS
- Overlap & Outranking
- Identifying Competitors
- Benchmarking Over Time
- Researching Competitor Ads
- Acting on the Data
- Third-Party Tools
- Common Mistakes to Avoid
- What Changed Recently
- References
1. Executive Summary
Google Ads Auction Insights is the most reliable first-party competitive intelligence tool available to search advertisers in 2026. Used correctly, it reveals not just who is competing against you, but how that competition is affecting your share of profitable traffic. The following five principles define best practice as of August 2026.
- Treat Auction Insights as a diagnostic, not a scoreboard. The report tells you where competitive pressure exists; it does not tell you whether winning more impressions will improve your business outcomes. Always pair auction metrics with conversion data, CPA, and ROAS before acting.[3][8]
- Separate business competitors from auction competitors. The advertisers you consider strategic rivals are often not the same domains that are actually pressuring your auctions. Build your priority tracking list from Auction Insights overlap rate and position above rate, not from industry assumptions.[2][11]
- Analyse trends over 30–90 days, not daily snapshots. Short windows produce noise. A competitor that appears for three days is testing; one that sustains high overlap rate for 60 days is a structural threat that warrants a response.[2][3][5]
- Use impression share lost (budget vs rank) as the triage step. Before raising bids or budgets, determine whether your visibility loss is driven by insufficient budget or by ad rank. The remedy for each is entirely different, and confusing them wastes spend.[1][3][6]
- Keep your competitive intelligence workflow hybrid. Auction Insights provides auction reality; the Google Ads Transparency Centre provides verified creative; manual SERP checks provide live context; and paid tools such as Semrush or SpyFu provide keyword and spend estimation depth. No single source is sufficient on its own.[1][2][5]
2. Benchmarks and Numbers at a Glance
| Metric | Typical range or threshold | Applies when | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retail search impression share (typical range) | 40–70% | U.S. retail search campaigns; vendor claim, not a controlled study | [60] |
| Google Search text-ad spend growth | +14% YoY | Q2 2026; based on more than $4 billion AUD annual managed spend | [59] |
| Google Search text-ad CPC growth | +1% YoY | Q2 2026; volume growth is outpacing price growth, indicating auction expansion rather than pure inflation | [59] |
| Google Shopping spend growth (Amazon absent) | +18% YoY | Q2 2026; Amazon held 0% impression share on Google Shopping in this period | [59] |
| Median European Search CPC | €0.46 per click | June 2026 market pulse median; vendor claim, European market, convert to AUD at prevailing rate | [56] |
| Search CPC month-on-month change | +7% MoM | June 2026 vs May 2026; vendor claim, European market | [56] |
| Electronics CPC trend | +13.7% MoM | June 2026; highest CPC growth vertical tracked; vendor claim | [56] |
| Health and Beauty CPC trend | +5.6% MoM | June 2026; mid-range CPC growth vertical; vendor claim | [56] |
| DIY and Power Tools CPC trend | −2.2% MoM | June 2026; declining CPC vertical; vendor claim — indicates reduced auction pressure in this category | [56] |
| Amazon Shopping impression share (Google Shopping) | 43% (June 2026 median); 0% (Q2 2026 Tinuiti study) | Note: these figures conflict. The 43% figure is a vendor claim from a European pulse report[56]; the 0% figure is from a study of more than $4 billion in managed spend[59]. Use the 0% figure for AU Google Shopping planning; treat 43% as a European or global retail signal only. | [56][59] |
| Cross-industry average display CPM | USD $3.12 per 1,000 impressions | GDN average across all industries; vendor claim; use as a floor benchmark only | [57] |
| Legal Services GDN CPM | USD $4.85 per 1,000 impressions | Highest-CPM vertical tracked; vendor claim; relevant when assessing display competitive pressure in legal categories | [57] |
| Retail/eCommerce GDN CPM | USD $2.10 per 1,000 impressions | Below the cross-industry average; vendor claim; indicates lower display auction pressure in retail | [57] |
| Auction Insights review cadence (stable accounts) | Monthly (30-day windows) | Consistent guidance across multiple 2026 sources; no single hard number but convergent recommendation | [2][3][8] |
| Auction Insights review cadence (active launches or competitive periods) | Weekly | During promotional periods, competitor entry events, or budget changes | [2][3][6] |
3. What Auction Insights Tells You
The Auction Insights report shows how your ads performed relative to other advertisers who were competing in the same auctions during the selected date range.[4] It does not reveal competitor bids, budgets, Quality Scores, or ad copy. It is a relative visibility report, not a competitive intelligence platform in its own right.[3][8]
The report is available at the account, campaign, ad group, and keyword level for Search and Shopping campaigns. The strongest practice in 2026 is to start at the campaign level, where the data volume is sufficient for reliable trend analysis, and then drill into ad group or keyword level only when you need to isolate a specific competitive pressure on a high-value term cluster.[2][8][9]
The six core metrics
| Metric | What it measures | Primary use |
|---|---|---|
| Impression share | Your ads’ actual impressions divided by estimated eligible impressions[4] | Spotting exposure gaps on valuable queries[3][6] |
| Overlap rate | How often a competitor’s ad showed in the same auction as yours[4] | Identifying your true auction rivals vs incidental overlap[3][8] |
| Position above rate | How often a competitor ranked above you when both ads appeared[4] | Assessing who is consistently beating you in shared auctions[3][8] |
| Top of page rate | How often your ad appeared above organic results[4] | Visibility indicator; interpret with conversion data[3][5] |
| Absolute top of page rate | How often your ad appeared in position 1 above all other ads[4] | Brand dominance and premium placement tracking[7][11] |
| Outranking share | How often your ad ranked above a competitor’s, or showed when theirs did not[4][10] | Tracking whether your competitive position is improving over time[3][8] |
A critical limitation to communicate to stakeholders: a competitor appearing in Auction Insights does not mean they are profitably competing with you. They may be testing, running a short promotion, or bidding broadly with poor match hygiene. Sustained presence over 30–60 days is the signal that warrants a strategic response.[3][11]
Worked example
Reading the Auction Insights table for the first time
- Setup: A Melbourne home security installation account spending $9,000 per month on a single Search campaign covering installation and monitoring keywords.
- Numbers: The 30-day Auction Insights report shows five competitors. Competitor A has a 74% overlap rate and a 61% position above rate. Competitor B has a 22% overlap rate and a 48% position above rate. Competitors C, D, and E have overlap rates below 8%. The account’s own impression share is 54%.
- Decision: Prioritise Competitor A for deep analysis (ad copy review via Transparency Centre, landing page audit, and bid review on the top five installation keywords). Set Competitors C, D, and E aside as background noise for this cycle.
- Why: A competitor with both high overlap rate (≥40%) and high position above rate (≥50%) is a structural rival pressing you in the auctions that matter most; an overlap rate below 10% indicates incidental presence, not a consistent competitive threat.[3][8]
4. Impression Share and Lost IS (Budget vs Rank)
Impression share (IS) is the foundation metric because it quantifies the gap between the traffic you are capturing and the traffic you are eligible to capture.[4][7] However, the raw IS number is far less useful than understanding why you are losing impressions. Google Ads splits impression share loss into two distinct causes: budget and rank.[4]
- IS Lost (Budget): Impressions missed because your daily budget ran out before the day ended. The fix is budget-side: increase the daily budget, reallocate from lower-priority campaigns, or apply shared budgets more strategically.[3][6]
- IS Lost (Rank): Impressions missed because your Ad Rank was too low to enter the auction or to show. Ad Rank is determined by bid, Quality Score (expected CTR, ad relevance, landing page experience), and the context of the search.[4][8] The fix is rank-side: improve Quality Score components, raise bids on specific keywords, or tighten match types to improve relevance signals.
The most common diagnostic error is raising bids to address an IS loss that is actually driven by budget. If your campaign is budget-constrained and you raise bids, your average CPC rises, your budget runs out earlier, and your total impression share can decrease.[3][8] Always diagnose the cause before applying the remedy.
Retail search campaigns in competitive markets typically see impression shares ranging from 40–70%, according to vendor benchmark data.[60] If your campaign is operating below 40% IS and IS Lost (Budget) accounts for the majority of that gap, a budget increase is likely the highest-leverage action. If IS Lost (Rank) dominates, a Quality Score and bid audit is the priority.
Worked example
Diagnosing IS loss type before acting on competitor pressure
- Setup: A Brisbane HVAC servicing account spending $5,500 per month on a Search campaign for “air conditioning service Brisbane” and related terms. The account manager notices that a competitor has risen from 30% to 58% impression share over the past 45 days and wants to raise bids.
- Numbers: The campaign’s own impression share is 41%. IS Lost (Budget) = 28%. IS Lost (Rank) = 31%. Total unaccounted loss = 28% + 31% = 59%, confirming the 41% IS figure is roughly correct (100% − 59% = 41%). The daily budget is $183 and the campaign is exhausting it by 2:00 pm on weekdays according to the hourly impression data.
- Decision: Increase the daily budget from $183 to $230 (a $47/day increase, approximately $1,410 per month additional spend) to address the budget-side loss first. Do not raise keyword bids at this stage. Reassess IS split after 14 days at the new budget.
- Why: When IS Lost (Budget) is ≥20%, raising bids without increasing budget accelerates budget exhaustion and reduces total impression coverage; the correct first lever is always budget when budget loss is the larger component.[3][6]
Worked example
Acting on IS Lost (Rank) after ruling out budget constraint
- Setup: A Perth dental practice account spending $4,200 per month on a Search campaign for cosmetic dentistry keywords. The campaign has IS Lost (Budget) = 4% and IS Lost (Rank) = 43%, giving an impression share of 53%.
- Numbers: The top five keywords by spend show Quality Scores of 4, 5, 4, 6, and 5 out of 10. The average CPC on the highest-volume keyword (“teeth whitening Perth”) is $6.80. A bid increase from $6.80 to $8.50 on this keyword (a 25% uplift) is estimated to improve Ad Rank sufficiently to move from position 3.2 to position 2.1 average, based on the bid simulator in the Google Ads UI. The practice’s current cost per booked consultation is $94, and the margin on a consultation conversion is $310. An $8.50 CPC with a 7.2% conversion rate produces a cost per conversion of $118 — still inside the $200 maximum CPA the practice has set.
- Decision: Raise the maximum CPC bid on “teeth whitening Perth” from $6.80 to $8.50. Simultaneously, raise the landing page experience score by updating the page to address ad relevance gaps identified in the Quality Score component breakdown.
- Why: When IS Lost (Rank) exceeds 30% and the CPA at the higher bid remains below the target threshold ($118 vs $200 maximum), increasing bids is justified; improving Quality Score is the parallel action that sustainably improves Ad Rank without further CPC increases.[1][6][8]
5. Overlap, Outranking and Position Metrics
Overlap rate, outranking share, and position above rate are the three relational metrics in Auction Insights — they describe your competitive standing relative to specific domains, rather than your absolute share of the available market.[4][11]
How to read the three metrics together
Overlap rate tells you how often you and a competitor are competing in the same auction. A high overlap rate does not mean a competitor is harming you; it simply means your keyword footprints intersect frequently. The business question is whether those shared auctions are valuable ones.[3][8]
Position above rate tells you, of the auctions where both ads showed, how often theirs ranked higher. A 70% position above rate means that in 70 out of every 100 auctions where both ads appeared, the competitor was ranked above you. Read this alongside conversion data: if your conversion rate on those shared queries is strong despite being outranked, the competitor’s higher position may not be commercially damaging.[3][5][8]
Outranking share is the inverse complement: it measures how often you were above them, or showed when they did not. A rising outranking share over a 60-day window is evidence that your ad rank is improving relative to that rival.[4][10][11]
Interpreting combinations
| Overlap rate | Position above rate (competitor) | Outranking share (yours) | Interpretation and recommended action |
|---|---|---|---|
| High (≥50%) | High (≥60%) | Low (≤30%) | Significant competitive pressure. Audit bid, Quality Score, and ad relevance on these terms. Confirm conversion economics before raising bids.[3][8] |
| High (≥50%) | Low (≤40%) | High (≥55%) | You are winning the head-to-head. Monitor for competitor bid increases but no immediate action required.[3][11] |
| Low (≤15%) | Any | Any | Incidental competitor. Do not adjust strategy based on this domain; revisit in 30 days.[3][8] |
| Medium (20–49%) | Rising over 60 days | Falling over 60 days | Emerging competitive threat. Investigate whether competitor has increased bids, expanded keywords, or improved Quality Score. Respond if conversion economics support it.[3][5] |
Worked example
Using position above rate and outranking share together to decide whether to respond
- Setup: A Sydney conveyancing firm account spending $7,500 per month on Search. The 60-day Auction Insights report shows that a new competitor domain entered in mid-September 2026 and now has a 44% overlap rate, a 66% position above rate, and the account’s own outranking share against that domain has dropped from 58% to 31% over the period.
- Numbers: During the same 60-day window, the account’s conversion rate on the core keyword cluster (“conveyancing fees Sydney”, “conveyancer Sydney CBD”) dropped from 9.1% to 7.4% — a 1.7 percentage point decline. At an average CPC of $12.40 and the previous 9.1% CVR, the cost per lead was $136. At 7.4% CVR, it is now $168. The target CPA is $200 per qualified lead, so the account is still within range but has deteriorated by $32 per lead.
- Decision: Raise maximum CPCs on the two highest-volume keywords by 15% (from $12.40 to $14.26) and simultaneously submit the landing page for a Quality Score review focusing on ad relevance. Set a review checkpoint for 1 November 2026 to assess whether outranking share has recovered above 45%.
- Why: A confirmed decline in both outranking share (−27 percentage points) and conversion rate (+$32/lead cost increase) over 60 days crosses the threshold for action when the account still has margin below the $200 CPA ceiling; a 15% bid increase is the minimum increment recommended before a reassessment.[3][5][8]
6. Identifying and Profiling Competitors
The most important discipline in competitive analysis is distinguishing your auction competitors from your business competitors. The domains that are strategically important to your organisation — franchise rivals, category leaders, close substitutes — are not always the same advertisers who are most active in your specific auctions.[2][11] Building your competitive tracking list from auction data, rather than assumptions, is the 2026 best practice.[1][3]
Step-by-step competitor identification
- Step 1: Pull Auction Insights at campaign level for your top three revenue-driving campaigns over the last 60 days. Sort by overlap rate descending.[2][8][9]
- Step 2: Identify the 3–5 domains with overlap rate ≥20% and a consistent presence across at least two of your three top campaigns. These are your priority competitors for deep profiling.[3][6][7]
- Step 3: Validate with manual SERP checks. Run incognito searches from the correct location and device context for your five highest-volume keywords. Screenshot the ads that appear. Confirm that the domains appearing in Auction Insights are visible in actual results, and identify any new entrants the report has not yet surfaced with sufficient data.[3][5][8]
- Step 4: Review the Google Ads Transparency Centre for each priority competitor. Verify their active ad creative and note the headline angles, offers, and CTAs currently running.[1][5]
- Step 5: Augment with a paid tool (Semrush or SpyFu) if you need keyword footprint depth — which additional terms they are bidding on, estimated spend trajectory, or gap opportunities not visible in your own campaigns.[1][2][7]
Profiling each priority competitor
For each of your 3–5 priority competitors, maintain a living profile covering: impression share trend (direction over 60 days), overlap rate, position above rate, top-of-page rate, current headline angle, current offer and CTA, landing page structure and trust signals, and any changes noted in the last 30 days.[1][11][14]
Worked example
Building a priority competitor shortlist from Auction Insights data
- Setup: A Melbourne commercial cleaning account spending $6,000 per month on Search. The account manager pulls Auction Insights at campaign level for the 60-day period 1 August 2026 – 30 September 2026 and finds eight domains listed.
- Numbers: Domain A: overlap rate 67%, position above rate 54%. Domain B: overlap rate 51%, position above rate 41%. Domain C: overlap rate 38%, position above rate 29%. Domains D through H: overlap rates ranging from 4% to 11%. The account’s own impression share is 48%, IS Lost (Rank) = 29%, IS Lost (Budget) = 23%.
- Decision: Designate Domains A, B, and C as the priority competitor set for the September–October 2026 analysis cycle. Domains D–H are excluded from active tracking. Schedule a manual incognito SERP check from a Melbourne IP address for the five highest-volume keywords to validate Domain A’s and B’s visible presence. Create a competitor profile card for each of the three priority domains in the team’s tracking spreadsheet.
- Why: Domains with overlap rate ≥20% and consistent presence across the target campaign period represent structural auction rivals; domains with overlap rate below 15% are incidental and do not justify the analysis overhead in a $6,000/month account.[3][6][7]
7. Benchmarking and Trends Over Time
A single Auction Insights snapshot is almost always misleading. A competitor’s impression share can spike because of a promotional budget injection and then retreat within a fortnight. What matters strategically is the direction and persistence of change over 30–90 days.[2][3][5]
Setting up a benchmarking cadence
- Monthly export for stable accounts: Pull a 30-day Auction Insights export on the last business day of each month and log it in a tracking spreadsheet. Record impression share, overlap rate, position above rate, and outranking share for each priority competitor.[2][3]
- Weekly review during active competitive periods: During promotional events (such as a competitor’s sale in November 2026 or an EOFY campaign in June 2027), switch to weekly exports and flag any competitor whose overlap rate increases by more than 10 percentage points in a single week.[2][3][6]
- Segment by device and time of day when you see overall metrics that seem inconsistent with spend patterns. Mobile and desktop audiences often exhibit different competitive landscapes, and a rival may be dominating mobile whilst you hold desktop.[2][8]
Interpreting trend signals
| Signal observed over 60 days | Most likely cause | Recommended response |
|---|---|---|
| Competitor IS rises from 30% to 55% | Budget expansion, new keyword additions, or improved Quality Score | Audit their ad copy and landing page for new offers; check whether your own conversion rate has declined in the same period[1][3] |
| Your outranking share falls from 60% to 38% | Competitor bid increase or Quality Score improvement | Review IS Lost (Rank) to confirm; consider bid increase or Quality Score work[3][8] |
| New domain appears with 35% overlap in first 30 days | New market entrant or existing player expanding keyword scope | Monitor for a second 30-day period before acting; check Transparency Centre for their creative strategy[3][11] |
| Competitor IS drops from 60% to 25% over 30 days | Budget cut, campaign pause, or seasonal withdrawal | Consider a temporary bid or budget increase to capture the vacated impression share if conversion economics support it[3][6] |
Worked example
Capitalising on a competitor’s seasonal budget withdrawal
- Setup: An Adelaide garden landscaping account spending $4,800 per month on Search. Monthly Auction Insights exports show that the category’s dominant competitor (Domain A, previously 62% overlap rate) drops to a 19% overlap rate in the July 2026 export, consistent with a pattern of reduced winter spend.
- Numbers: In the June 2026 period, the account’s impression share was 39% with IS Lost (Budget) = 18% and IS Lost (Rank) = 43%. In July 2026 (with Domain A retracted), impression share climbs to 58% with the same budget and bids, confirming that Domain A was responsible for approximately 19 percentage points of IS Lost (Rank) pressure. The account’s cost per booked landscape job in July is $87, compared to $124 in June — a $37 reduction driven by lower auction competition. Target CPA is $150.
- Decision: Increase the daily budget from $160 to $210 (a $50/day increase, approximately $1,550 additional spend for August 2026) to capture maximum volume during the low-competition window. Set a calendar reminder to revert to the $160 daily budget by 1 September 2026 when competitor activity typically resumes based on prior-year patterns.
- Why: When a primary competitor’s impression share drops by ≥30 percentage points and your own CPA falls below 60% of target ($87 vs $150), a temporary budget increase captures high-ROI volume that would otherwise go to minor competitors; the seasonal timing makes this a bounded, reversible decision.[3][6]
8. Researching Competitor Ads and Landing Pages
Auction Insights tells you who is competing and how often, but it says nothing about what they are saying to prospects or how they are converting traffic. Ad copy and landing page research closes this gap and is now considered a core component of PPC competitive intelligence, not an optional extra.[1][8][11][14]
Ad copy research workflow
- Google Ads Transparency Centre is the primary source for verified current ads. It shows which creative a domain is actively running, the regions where ads are served, and the approximate date range of activity.[1][5] Review priority competitors here monthly and log changes to headline angle, offer, CTA, and proof points.
- Manual SERP checks from an incognito browser, in the correct geographic context, capture ads that may not yet appear in the Transparency Centre index and reveal real-time message positioning on your most valuable queries.[3][5][8]
- Track the following dimensions for each competitor ad observed: headline angle (price, speed, trust, feature, comparison, or outcome); offer type (free trial, free quote, guarantee, consultation, discount); CTA phrasing; proof elements (reviews, awards, certifications, statistics); and intent alignment (informational, comparison, or transactional).[11]
Landing page research framework
When a competitor’s Auction Insights metrics strengthen, their landing page is often a significant contributing factor. A superior landing page improves Quality Score, which in turn improves Ad Rank without a bid increase.[4][8] Review competitor landing pages for the following on a monthly cadence or whenever you observe a meaningful auction shift:[1][11][14]
- Message match: Does the landing page headline directly mirror the ad headline? Close message match between ad and page is a Quality Score signal.
- Offer clarity and strength: Is the primary offer (price, outcome, guarantee) stated above the fold within the first 200 pixels?
- Trust signals: Count the number and type — Google reviews badge, industry certification logos, testimonial count, years in operation, case study thumbnails.
- Conversion friction: How many form fields are required? Is click-to-call prominent on mobile? Is there navigation that allows visitors to exit the conversion path?
- Page speed proxy: Use Google PageSpeed Insights (free) to score the competitor’s landing page. A score below 50 on mobile suggests a Quality Score vulnerability you can exploit.
Worked example
Translating a landing page audit into a Quality Score improvement action
- Setup: A Gold Coast solar panel installation account spending $11,000 per month on Search. The account’s top competitor (Domain B, 59% overlap rate, 64% position above rate) is identified for a landing page audit in October 2026 after the account’s IS Lost (Rank) rises from 28% to 41% over 45 days.
- Numbers: The manual audit reveals: Domain B’s landing page headline reads “Solar Installation Gold Coast — Free Quote Today”, which exactly matches their ad headline. Their form has 3 fields (name, phone, suburb). Google PageSpeed Insights scores their mobile page at 71. The account’s own landing page headline reads “Quality Solar Panels for Queensland Homes” — a generic headline that does not match the ad copy “Solar Panels Gold Coast — Same Week Install”. The account’s own form has 7 fields. PageSpeed mobile score: 58. The account’s average Quality Score on the top 5 keywords is 5/10 vs an estimated 7–8/10 for Domain B based on their Ad Rank behaviour at lower bids.
- Decision: Update the landing page headline to “Solar Installation Gold Coast — Same Week Quotes” to achieve message match with the ad. Reduce the form from 7 fields to 3 (name, phone, suburb). Commission a PageSpeed optimisation to reach a score of ≥70 on mobile. Set a 30-day Quality Score review checkpoint for 1 November 2026.
- Why: Message match and landing page experience are two of the three Quality Score components; closing a 2–3 point Quality Score gap against the market leader reduces IS Lost (Rank) without a bid increase and lowers CPC at equivalent Ad Rank.[4][8][11]
9. Acting on the Data (Bids, Budget, Defending Brand)
Auction Insights is a diagnostic tool; the moment it becomes a trigger for automatic competitive reactions — raising bids whenever a rival’s impression share increases — it starts driving costs up without a corresponding improvement in business outcomes.[3][5][10][11] The 2026 best practice is to act only when auction pressure is confirmed by a corresponding deterioration in conversion volume, CPA, or ROAS, not on the basis of position metrics alone.[3][4][7]
When to raise bids
Raise bids when: (1) IS Lost (Rank) is the dominant loss type (≥25% of available impressions); (2) conversion economics at the higher bid still sit below your target CPA or above your target ROAS; and (3) the pressure is sustained over at least 30 days, not a short test by the competitor.[1][6][8]
When to increase budget
Increase budget when: (1) IS Lost (Budget) is the dominant loss type; (2) the incremental traffic at the current CPC is converting profitably; and (3) the campaign is not already over-serving on low-quality queries that inflate conversion costs.[6][8]
When to reduce bids or concede ground
Reduce bids or concede when: (1) you are buying top-of-page visibility that does not improve CPA or ROAS; (2) the query set has low commercial intent; (3) the competitor’s dominance in a segment is too costly to challenge relative to margin.[2][4][6][11] Treating some auction losses as strategic wins — accepting lower position share in exchange for better CPA — is an explicitly endorsed 2026 practice.[2][3][6]
Defending brand terms
Run Auction Insights specifically on your brand campaign to detect competitors bidding on your brand name.[2] If a competitor achieves an overlap rate above 30% and a position above rate above 40% on your own brand keywords, that is a structural threat to brand traffic quality and message control. The response priorities are: (1) ensure your brand campaign bids are sufficient to maintain absolute top of page rate above 80%; (2) check for unauthorised resellers or affiliates and address through policy, not just bidding; (3) avoid overbidding for brand coverage beyond what your conversion economics justify.[2][4][11]
Worked example
Defending brand terms against a direct competitor bidding on your brand name
- Setup: A Sydney-based accounting software vendor spending $3,200 per month on a dedicated brand Search campaign. The October 2026 Auction Insights report for the brand campaign shows a direct competitor with a 38% overlap rate, a 44% position above rate, and the account’s own absolute top of page rate has declined from 91% to 73% over 45 days.
- Numbers: The brand campaign’s current average CPC is $1.10. The competitor’s presence has coincided with a 12% drop in brand campaign CTR (from 28.4% to 25.0%) and a 9% decline in brand-driven trial sign-ups (from 34 to 31 per week, at an average revenue value of $420 each per annual plan). Weekly revenue at risk from the CTR decline: (34 − 31) × $420 = $1,260 per week, or approximately $5,040 per month. Raising brand campaign bids from $1.10 to $1.80 (a 64% increase) is estimated to restore absolute top of page rate to 88% based on the bid simulator. Monthly incremental cost of the bid increase on approximately 42,000 brand impressions at 25% CTR and 10,500 clicks: (10,500 × ($1.80 − $1.10)) = $7,350 additional monthly cost.
- Decision: Raise brand keyword maximum CPCs from $1.10 to $1.50 (a 36% increase, not the full $1.80) to recover absolute top of page rate to approximately 82%, at an estimated incremental cost of $4,200 per month — below the $5,040 monthly revenue at risk. Do not bid to $1.80; the marginal cost exceeds the marginal revenue at that increment.
- Why: Brand defence bids should be raised to the point where the incremental cost of recovering position equals the estimated revenue preserved; beyond that threshold, overbidding for absolute top placement destroys margin without proportional business return.[2][4][11]
10. Third-Party Competitive Tools
The Google Ads Auction Insights report is authoritative for auction-level competitive data but has deliberate limitations: it does not reveal competitor bids, budgets, keyword lists, or ad creative history.[3][4] Third-party tools fill these gaps with modelled estimates, creative archives, and cross-channel intelligence. The key word is estimates — no external tool has access to Google’s auction data, and their figures should be treated as directional rather than precise.[1][2][7]
Recommended tool stack by use case
| Use case | Best tool(s) | What the tool adds beyond Auction Insights | Limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auction reality and overlap | Google Ads Auction Insights (native) | Actual impression share, overlap rate, outranking share from real auctions | No bid, budget, or creative data[3][4] |
| Verified current ad creative | Google Ads Transparency Centre | Confirmed active ads, regions served, approximate run dates | No performance data, no historical archive depth[1][5] |
| Keyword footprint and spend estimates | Semrush (Advertising Research), SpyFu | Estimated paid keyword lists, estimated monthly spend, keyword gap analysis | Modelled estimates; can be materially inaccurate for small accounts[1][2][7] |
| Live SERP validation | Manual incognito search, Google Ad Preview Tool | Real-time competitive SERP in the correct location and device context | Manual effort; point-in-time snapshot only[3][5][8] |
| Cross-channel competitive tracking | AdMapix or similar consolidated platforms | Competitor ad tracking across Google, Meta, and other channels in one dashboard | Subscription cost; data freshness varies by platform[18][19] |
| Historical creative archive | Google Ads Transparency Centre, swipe-file tools | Ad creative history to identify messaging trends and seasonal patterns | Transparency Centre coverage depth varies; third-party archives may lag[1][5] |
Semrush and SpyFu: practical use in an Australian context
Semrush’s Advertising Research module and keyword gap tool are the most widely recommended paid tools for Google Ads competitive intelligence in 2026.[1][15] SpyFu offers a more PPC-focused interface with estimated CPC and keyword history that suits accounts where understanding competitor keyword expansion is the primary need.[1][2][7] For Australian-market accounts, note that both tools’ spend and traffic estimates can be less accurate for smaller local markets than for the U.S. market where their training data is densest. Use their outputs for directional signals — particularly keyword gap identification and spend trend direction — not for precise budget benchmarking.
Worked example
Using Semrush keyword gap to find competitor terms not yet in your own campaigns
- Setup: A Canberra HR software vendor spending $8,500 per month on Search. After identifying Domain C as a priority competitor (52% overlap rate, 48% position above rate in Auction Insights for October 2026), the team runs a Semrush Keyword Gap analysis comparing the vendor’s paid keyword list to Domain C’s estimated paid keyword list.
- Numbers: The Keyword Gap report shows 214 keywords estimated to be in Domain C’s paid portfolio that are not in the vendor’s campaigns. Of these, Semrush estimates 38 keywords have a monthly search volume above 100 in Australia and an average CPC above $4.50. The top opportunity keyword — “HR software small business Australia” — has an estimated monthly volume of 880, an estimated CPC of $7.20, and is not in the vendor’s current account. At a 6% estimated CVR and $7.20 CPC, cost per lead would be $120, compared to the account’s current average of $104. The target CPA is $180.
- Decision: Add the top 12 keyword opportunities (those with estimated volume ≥200 and CPC ≤$9.00) to a new ad group in the existing campaign with an initial daily budget of $45 for a 21-day test period starting 1 November 2026. Treat Semrush CPC estimates as directional; set actual bids using the Google Keyword Planner range as the primary reference.
- Why: Keyword Gap analysis surfaces demand the competitor is capturing that is not visible in your own Auction Insights data (which only shows auctions you entered); estimated CPA of $120 at the modelled CVR sits 33% below the $180 target CPA, providing sufficient margin for modelling error in the Semrush estimates.[1][2][7]
11. Common Mistakes to Avoid
Even experienced practitioners make systematic errors when using Auction Insights. The following are the most consequential mistakes observed in 2026 guidance and the specific corrective actions for each.[3][5][8][11]
Mistake 1: Reacting to daily fluctuations
Daily auction dynamics are noisy. A competitor can double their impression share for two days because of a budget test, then retreat. Reacting with bid or budget changes to daily spikes wastes management time and can destabilise Smart Bidding algorithms that need a stable signal window.[2][3][5] Corrective action: Set a minimum window of 30 days for any action triggered by Auction Insights data. Flag daily changes but require 30-day trend confirmation before acting.
Mistake 2: Using account-level Auction Insights as the primary view
The account-level report mixes campaigns with different intents, different budgets, and different competitive sets. A competitor that is highly present in your brand campaign will inflate their apparent relevance if viewed at account level alongside your non-brand campaigns.[2][8][9] Corrective action: Always start analysis at campaign level and segment brand and non-brand campaigns separately.
Mistake 3: Confusing impression share loss cause
Raising bids to address IS Lost (Budget), or increasing budget to address IS Lost (Rank), applies the wrong lever and wastes spend.[3][6][8] Corrective action: Check the IS Lost (Budget) vs IS Lost (Rank) split before any impression share remediation action. The split is shown in the campaign performance columns, not in the Auction Insights report itself.
Mistake 4: Targeting competitors purely to “win” position metrics
A higher outranking share or top-of-page rate is only valuable if it improves business outcomes. Chasing position metrics against an irrational competitor who is overbidding simply inflates CPCs for both parties.[2][4][10][11] Corrective action: Frame every Auction Insights action in terms of CPA, ROAS, or revenue impact. If raising outranking share by 20 percentage points will not produce a measurable improvement in conversion economics, concede the position.
Mistake 5: Ignoring the Looker Studio removal
As of 2026, Auction Insights data has been removed from Looker Studio for new data sources, with existing connections losing access subsequently.[8][48] Teams that relied on Looker Studio dashboards for competitive reporting now have a blind spot if they have not migrated their workflow. Corrective action: Export Auction Insights data manually from the Google Ads UI on a scheduled cadence and store it in a shared spreadsheet or a reporting tool that accepts manual data imports.
Mistake 6: Treating third-party tool estimates as precise figures
Semrush, SpyFu, and similar tools produce modelled estimates of competitor spend and keyword lists. These can be significantly inaccurate, particularly for smaller Australian market accounts.[1][2][7] Corrective action: Always cross-reference third-party tool keyword suggestions against actual search volume data in Google Keyword Planner before allocating budget to new terms identified via competitive tools.
Mistake 7: Failing to segment by device or time of day
A competitor may dominate mobile auctions while you hold desktop, or compete aggressively during business hours while your account is strongest on evenings. A blended view masks these patterns.[2][8] Corrective action: When overall metrics are inconsistent with spend patterns, apply device and time-of-day segments to the Auction Insights report and investigate the dimension showing the largest IS Lost (Rank) gap.
Worked example
Identifying a device-segmented competitive blind spot
- Setup: A Hobart private health insurance broker account spending $5,200 per month on Search. The blended Auction Insights report for September 2026 shows the account’s impression share at 51%, which appears reasonable. However, conversion volume has dropped 18% versus August 2026 despite stable spend.
- Numbers: Applying a device segment to the campaign reveals: desktop impression share = 63%, mobile impression share = 34%. The mobile IS Lost (Rank) is 47% versus desktop IS Lost (Rank) at 18%. Mobile conversions account for 58% of total leads. A priority competitor (Domain D) has a mobile overlap rate of 71% and a mobile position above rate of 68%, versus a desktop overlap rate of 29% and desktop position above rate of 31%. The account’s mobile bid adjustment is currently set at −20%.
- Decision: Remove the −20% mobile bid adjustment (set it to 0%) and set a +15% mobile bid adjustment instead, effective 1 October 2026. This effectively increases mobile bids by 35 percentage points from their current level. Review mobile IS Lost (Rank) and conversion volume after 21 days.
- Why: When 58% of conversions originate on mobile but mobile IS Lost (Rank) is 47% — 2.6× higher than desktop — a negative mobile bid adjustment is directionally wrong and directly explains the conversion volume decline; correcting the adjustment is the highest-priority action before any keyword or budget change.[2][8]
12. What Changed Recently (Last 30 Days)
As of August 2026, the core Auction Insights report mechanics — its six metrics, its availability at campaign, ad group, and keyword level, and its filtering capabilities — have not changed based on current Google Ads Help documentation.[4][2] There are no new competitive metrics announced for the report in the last 30 days.
The most significant recent product change affecting competitive reporting workflows is the removal of Auction Insights from Looker Studio for new data sources, with existing data sources losing access on a rolling timeline.[8][48] This is a material operational change for any team that built competitive dashboards in Looker Studio. The practical consequence is that Auction Insights data must now be accessed through the Google Ads UI directly or via scheduled exports, since API access also remains constrained in public documentation.[16][19]
API access status
As of August 2026, Auction Insights data is not available through the Google Ads API in the publicly documented endpoints.[16][19] Automated competitive reporting that previously relied on API pulls must therefore be replaced with scheduled UI exports or third-party tools that access the data through their own integration methods. This is a notable limitation for enterprise accounts running automated reporting pipelines.
Impression share interpretation in 2026
Industry commentary in 2026 flags Google’s 2025 double-serving policy change — which permitted the same advertiser’s ads to appear in multiple positions under certain conditions — as a reason why impression share figures may be harder to interpret than in prior years.[3] Treat impression share metrics as directional indicators of relative competitive presence rather than precise measures of auction entry frequency.
Auction Insights and Performance Max
Performance Max campaigns have a different and more limited Auction Insights view than Search campaigns. In 2026, the best practice remains to assess Search campaign Auction Insights separately from Performance Max, as the competitive overlap data for PMax is less granular and the levers for improving Ad Rank differ significantly from standard Search.[3][8]
Market context: rising search spend in 2026
Google Search text-ad spend grew 14% year-on-year in Q2 2026 while CPC grew only 1% YoY, indicating that the growth is primarily volume-driven — more advertisers entering auctions and bidding on a broader query set — rather than pure CPC inflation.[59] For Auction Insights users, this means new competitors are likely entering your auction data throughout 2026, making the discipline of filtering to 30–60 day trend windows more important than ever to distinguish structural entrants from short-term testers.
Worked example
Migrating a Looker Studio competitive dashboard to a manual export workflow
- Setup: A digital marketing team managing a $22,000 per month Google Ads account for a national Australian furniture retailer. The team previously pulled Auction Insights data into a Looker Studio dashboard via a connector. Following the removal of Auction Insights from Looker Studio for new data sources in 2026, the dashboard now shows no competitive data for the three Search campaigns that drive 78% of revenue.
- Numbers: The account has 3 priority Search campaigns. Each campaign requires a monthly Auction Insights export covering: impression share, overlap rate, position above rate, outranking share, and top-of-page rate for 5 priority competitor domains. Total data points per month: 3 campaigns × 5 competitors × 5 metrics = 75 data points. Manual export time per campaign: approximately 4 minutes in the Google Ads UI. Total monthly export time: 12 minutes. The team’s hourly rate for this task is $85. Monthly cost of manual workflow: 0.2 hours × $85 = $17 per month.
- Decision: Replace the Looker Studio connector with a structured Google Sheets template. On the last business day of each month (next occurrence: 31 October 2026), the assigned analyst exports Auction Insights for each of the 3 campaigns as a CSV, pastes the relevant rows into the tracking sheet, and the sheet’s built-in charts update automatically. No third-party tool subscription is required for this migration.
- Why: With Auction Insights removed from Looker Studio for new sources[8][48] and API access unavailable[16][19], a manually maintained spreadsheet is the most reliable and cost-effective workflow for accounts below enterprise scale; at $17 per month in analyst time, the operational cost is negligible relative to the $22,000 monthly spend this data informs.
References
- [1] https://growthmindedmarketing.com/blog/google-ads-auction-insights/ growthmindedmarketing.com
- [2] https://www.thesarahstemen.com/blog/how-to-read-google-auction-insights www.thesarahstemen.com
- [3] https://www.karooya.com/blog/google-ads-auction-insights-2026-guide-to-tracking-and-outman… www.karooya.com
- [4] https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/2579754?hl=en support.google.com
- [5] https://clickyowl.com/google-ads-auction-insights/ clickyowl.com
- [6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVc4gDdSi6c www.youtube.com
- [7] https://il-webdesign.com/auction-insights-report-google-ads-nyc/ il-webdesign.com
- [8] https://excellappc.com/blog/google-ads-auction-insights/ excellappc.com
- [9] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEzXlpmk9fk www.youtube.com
- [10] https://blog.adnabu.com/google-ads/google-ads-auction-insights/ blog.adnabu.com
- [11] https://www.thebrandamp.com/blog/auction-insights-in-googleads-how-to-analyze-competitors/ www.thebrandamp.com
- [12] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tfkzxLzMzM www.youtube.com
- [13] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQRnw4XOSNM www.youtube.com
- [14] https://yoyofumedia.com/how-to-use-auction-insights/ yoyofumedia.com
- [15] https://www.semrush.com/blog/google-ads-competitor-analysis/ www.semrush.com
- [16] https://roa-marketing.com/blog/google-ads-competitor-analysis-strategy-2026/ roa-marketing.com
- [17] https://clicksgeek.com/google-ads-competitor-analysis/ clicksgeek.com
- [18] https://www.admapix.com/blog/best-practices/competitor-ad-analysis-framework www.admapix.com
- [19] https://www.admapix.com/blog/ad-intelligence/check-competitors-google-ads www.admapix.com
- [20] https://elevate-digital-solutions.com/best-competitor-research-and-analysis-tools/ elevate-digital-solutions.com
- [21] https://www.get-ryze.ai/blog/adwords-competitor-research www.get-ryze.ai
- [22] https://www.scrapingbee.com/blog/google-ads-competitor-analysis/ www.scrapingbee.com
- [23] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTVoDS5U7NU www.youtube.com
- [24] https://twominutereports.com/blog/google-ads-best-practices twominutereports.com
- [25] https://www.admapix.com/blog/ad-intelligence/google-ads-competitor-analysis www.admapix.com
- [26] https://leadsbridge.com/blog/google-ads-best-practices/ leadsbridge.com
- [27] https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/180929 support.google.com
- [28] https://blog.coupler.io/google-ads-competitor-analysis/ blog.coupler.io
- [29] https://www.get-ryze.ai/blog/google-adwords-competitor-keywords www.get-ryze.ai
- [30] https://www.scrapingbee.com/blog/google-ads-competitor-analysis-system/ www.scrapingbee.com
- [31] https://directiveconsulting.com/blog/the-b2b-marketers-guide-to-google-ads-best-practices-… directiveconsulting.com
- [32] https://searchengineland.com/google-ads-tactics-to-drop-464123 searchengineland.com
- [33] https://www.reddit.com/r/googleads/comments/1qaoh5u/what_is_best_practice/ www.reddit.com
- [34] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_RTd76T6LnE www.youtube.com
- [35] https://www.causalfunnel.com/blog/auction-insights-in-google-ads-meaning-metrics-best-prac… www.causalfunnel.com
- [36] https://improvado.io/blog/google-ads-campaign-guide improvado.io
- [37] https://www.swydo.com/blog/google-ads-metrics/ www.swydo.com
- [38] https://projectsupply.in/blog/google-ads-auction-insights-guide projectsupply.in
- [39] https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-ads-bidding-strategies-where-to-spend-your-time… www.searchenginejournal.com
- [40] https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/7640032?hl=en support.google.com
- [41] https://www.digitalapplied.com/blog/how-google-ads-auction-works-complete-breakdown www.digitalapplied.com
- [42] https://www.reddit.com/r/googleads/comments/1qaoyec/its_2026_whats_one_piece_of_google_ads… www.reddit.com
- [43] https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/14005836?hl=en support.google.com
- [44] https://www.usekaya.com/blog/how-to-use-google-ads-auction-insights www.usekaya.com
- [45] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8jWldzyn9s www.youtube.com
- [46] https://glama.ai/mcp/servers/logly/mureo/tools/google_ads_auction_insights_get glama.ai
- [47] https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/2454137?hl=en support.google.com
- [48] https://searchengineland.com/google-removes-auction-insights-looker-studio-446073 searchengineland.com
- [49] https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/19888?hl=en support.google.com
- [50] https://support.google.com/google-ads/thread/114605912/if-someone-change-the-keyword-text-… support.google.com
- [51] https://support.google.com/google-ads/thread/114605912?hl=en&msgid=114611400 support.google.com
- [52] https://ppcpanos.com/what-is-the-audience-insights-tool-and-how-it-increases-performance-i… ppcpanos.com
- [53] https://groups.google.com/g/adwords-api/c/ohWn5N-rhDg groups.google.com
- [54] https://groups.google.com/g/adwords-api/c/30s21wGZkOU groups.google.com
- [55] https://www.adthena.com/resources/blog/the-limitations-of-auction-insights-explained/ www.adthena.com
- [56] https://smarter-ecommerce.com/en/smec-market-observer/monthly-market-pulse/june-2026/ smarter-ecommerce.com
- [57] https://www.digitalapplied.com/blog/display-advertising-benchmarks-2026-data-points www.digitalapplied.com
- [58] https://benly.ai/learn/meta-ads/auction-insights-2026 benly.ai
- [59] https://www.digitalapplied.com/blog/q2-2026-digital-ad-benchmarks-tinuiti-report-analysis www.digitalapplied.com
- [60] https://www.ppcmarketinghub.com/blog/google-ads-auction-insights-guide/ www.ppcmarketinghub.com
- [61] https://searchengineland.com/google-ads-auction-insights-461513 searchengineland.com
Don’t want to do this yourself?
Get a complete, ready-to-launch Google Ads campaign — keywords validated against real search data, copy written to the best practices on this page, and a proper negative-keyword list — built for your business and delivered within 24 hours.
One-off price · Human-reviewed · No subscription · No access to your Google Ads account
This page is maintained by Sean Cooney at Omologist.com. Content is refreshed every two months using real-time research from authoritative Google Ads sources. Worked examples are illustrative scenarios calculated from published benchmarks, not client results.

